Samsung
has risen through the ranks of Android OEMs (Original Equipment Manufacturer) on the heels of its flagship Galaxy
S series. Beginning in 2010 with the original
Galaxy S all the way through this year’s S5, Samsung has consistently given
users a bigger more powerful upgrade year after year. Each year brought
improvements that, along with the Korean Giant’s massive advertising budget, helped
Samsung become a household name throughout America. Samsung even renamed anentire airport terminal in a massively expensive marketing push.
There
seemed to be a point in time where you either had a ‘Samsung’ or an ‘iPhone’,
and even casual users of an HTC or Motorola handset though they had a Samsung
Device. That is a testament to Samsung’s marketing more than anything along
with their deep market penetration. I still remember back in 2010 one of my
friends got an original S and referred to it as “an iPhone on Verizon”; due to
the AT&T’s exclusive distribution of the iPhone 4 in the states. For years Samsung’s offerings have been the best-selling
flagship Android devices, being compared to iPhones in almost every review. In
the early days of the S series Samsung produced some of the best hardware
available for Android, but it feared it might be lumped in with other OEM it
competed with. To combat this they developed their own Touch Wiz skin overlay
on top of Android. In theory this gave the advantage of having a Google powered
phone but with extra software that was supposed to enhance usability. Average
users may not notice the caveats of Touch Wiz, especially if they have only
ever owned a Samsung device.
When
you buy a new device it's no longer about which phone has the largest battery or the
highest clocked processor, because Smartphone hardware is plateauing. Companies like Apple are fine tuning their
operating systems to run smoother on less powerful devices. The new iPhone 6 has
a smaller battery and slower processor than the S5, but according to these benchmark tests that doesn't really have a negative effect on overall performance.
To the casual observer, the situation looks to be Android
vs iPhone (sorry Windows Phone and RIP Blackberry), but Sammy’s biggest
competition is really coming from other Android OEMs.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46ab3/46ab394c6b6be1249ad2401b922caa0e3e6001cf" alt=""
As the chart above illustrates, the real competition is coming from low cost
Chinese manufacturers like Huawei, Lenovo and Xiaomi. In the days of the S2 and
S3 Samsung had the advantage of being so big it could leverage the market to
produce high quality phones for a cheaper price than most of its competitors,
but now with greatly improved software from Google that is designed to run on
less hardware (which is now cheaper) that advantage no longer exists.
Last week, Samsung released its earnings guidance for Q3 2014 and the numbers did not look very good.
The table above shows the
outlook at a glance and while the numbers are not horrible, some believe it
could be the start of a trend that could land Samsung at the bottom of the
ranks of Android OEM if they fail to curb the problem. The release of the S6 is
due out early in 2015, which should help sales. That, along with the recently
released Galaxy Alpha, which looks to be a massive leap forward in design, might be enough to keep
Sammy at the top. But then again it might not. The market isn’t the same as it
was a few years ago when Samsung reigned over Android. Now there’s not one but
two bigger iPhones, competition on the high end from the likes of Motorola, LG,
and HTC, and a push from low cost Chinese companies. Any one of these pressures
could bring them down, but they aren't out yet.
-Technical Scott
-Technical Scott
No comments:
Post a Comment